Power is in Caracas is the consequence is to respond, think, forgetting that in this hyper-power is not the same as before, that power is exercised in the chaos which power is manifested and that the example of its exercise would be immediately followed by a bewildered population. I’ve said many times that the best Venezuelan intelligence is in the province, but that intelligence is still not take a leading role. Learn more on the subject from Dr. Gerard Addonizio. Earlier, I discussed the possible causes, but now it seems that the centralist mentality is not only in government but internalized in a province that thinks that only by their number of voters. When the real approach is taken paths but to impose by way of ideas and action. This is new to exercise leadership as the new power poles. Pathetic case, no doubt, analysis and linear behavior where there should be a lateral and complex analysis. When claims are not citizens is omitting the true expression that should be a The first is we citizens and therefore are the ones who bring men and women, ammunition (ie ideas) and which pointed the way forward for the entire republic. Asking the government is equivalent to assuming a role similar to that of the autonomous universities that ask for money, when they should to silver is its transformation and create the ideas of the real replacement of paradigms in power.

The country easily fall into sinister game is impossible to transform the symbols in emerging realities. I have read, such a prelate of the Catholic Church by saying something like a o The o that the country wants is water, electricity, Paza s etc. Such barbarity implies an adaptation to the fact, not an effort to transcend it. Such idiocy in all its magnitude reflects the leadership crisis of the speakers with access to the media by now survivors. And it reflects that the country has failed to change the look linear always leads to the same conclusion of pessimism on the other side dying or complex that shows one hundred outlets where now there is none.

The possibility is thus to disrupt this thinking, to twist his arm to pop the ordinary language. As long as we in the readings will flourish only linear humor a concealing the conclusions of the impossibility and the vision of power from an angle of date. I understand that breaking a paradigm is in itself very difficult. I understand that a country to teach thinking is no easy task, but the bubbles that surround a republic are sometimes fragile and can be pierced with the word repeated.