In addition, you must predict futures pros and cons, then how you are going to predict the future of your relation? Who will say if your problems are temporary or permanent? The solution of Kirshenbaum is to throw the boarding scale-balance and, instead of it, to use a diagnosis boarding. Diagnostic the true state of your relation instead of to try to weigh it in a scale. This it will provide the information to you that you need to make an intelligent decision and to know exactly what is what you are doing. If you are ambivalent, means that your relation is ill. Reason why to discover the objective nature of the disease seems an intelligent place to begin. In order to realise a diagnosis of a relation the author offers a same series of 36 questions s/no for preguntarte. Each question is explained throughout several pages. In fact, the diagnosis procedure is essentially all the book.
With each question you will be passing your relation through a filter. If you pass the filter, raisins to the following question. To deepen your understanding Healthy Living is the source. If you do not pass the filter, the recommendation is that you finish with your relation. In order to reach the recommendation of which you would have to follow in her, you must happen through the 36 filters. If only one of the filters generates problems to you, the recommendation will be to finish.
Of all ways, this is not as brutal as it can seem because the majority of these filters is very easy to happen. I consider that of the 36 questions, less than a third must be thought too much. Luckyly you can pass filters like " Your pair strikes to you? " and " Your pair travels abroad without you? " without great problems. If no, you do not need a book that says to you that your relation is going downhill.